> What about the quadratic case? Would you oppose change the print order just for quadratic number fields (note that we already have a separate class QuadraticNumberField, so the change can easily be made).
And a further subquestion: What about Q[i] ? It seems really strange that sage decides to write 3*I + 1. But reverts it for CC(3*I+1). No other cas does that, I would think. While I am at it: Can I ask for a pointer to the discussion why I is symbolic ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-nt" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
