Thanks for putting this list together (and redirecting this to the NT list).  A 
couple of them seem directly related, and the others are still at least 
marginally.

A question, since it’s been a while since I engaged in this kind of behavior :-}

On sufficiently old Trac records, that have not been updated to ‘git’ 
standards, how do I incorporate a branch from such a ticket into my source 
tree?  So far, what I have tried (based on the developer guide) results in 
complaints that the source is “not a git repository”.

Justin

> On Jul 21, 2021, at 03:09, John Cremona <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Samuel Lelievre <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 10:35
> Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Orders in number fields
> To: sage-devel <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> Orders in number fields certainly need work.
> 
> This Sage Trac query:
> 
>    https://trac.sagemath.org/query?order=id&desc=1&summary=~orders
> 
> and similar queries with "order" or "ring of integers" reveal the
> following open tickets
> 
>    #28706 clarify order generation in number fields with bracket syntax
>    #28552  Elements in orders in number fields are considered as field 
> elements
>    #27413  Implement picard group and unit group for non-maximal orders
>    #25709  inject_variables is broken for orders of number fields
>    #24934  Orders are not unique parents
>    #24031  Coercion between Matrices over orders and over the number field
>    #23971  Euclidean division in quadratic imaginary orders
>    #23321  Implemented functionality for Quotient Rings of Orders
>    #23236  Create p-maximal orders
>    #18865  Can't make ring homomorphism from ring of integers to a
> residue field
>    #16556  AbsoluteOrder.random_element and
> PolynomialQuotientRing_integer.random_element
>    #14740  Infinite loop in creation of number field order
>    #13568  Quaternion Orders over Number Fields
>    #12242  Divisibility of number field order elements needs work
>    #5893   Norm Form for Number Fields and Orders
>    #4738   base_ring of orders in relative number fields is wrong
>    #1134   optimize creating elements of orders and number fields by
> coercing in lists
> 
> I can also link to discussions on other channels if that seems useful.
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/9b44b324-797a-42a8-bb09-d54ae57e9a83n%40googlegroups.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-nt" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-nt/CAD0p0K5F%2B7q--1Z-vupW4ULKT1ogDwgLK%3Di7LNte7zzbnGcP1g%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-nt" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-nt/F5942E99-CACC-4839-913D-8FE7DEB4AEC9%40mac.com.

Reply via email to