I don’t like the debian fix. In fact it doesn’t look like a fix at all. I would need a serious explanation of their change. That “-Wl,-r” already caused trouble in spack last month (on OS X) and as it turns out it was spack's compiler wrappers’ fault. I am inclined to say that debian did something nasty or not well thought about to gcc.
Which feels rather improbable on the part of debian but we never know. François > On 6/11/2016, at 23:15, Emmanuel Charpentier <emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > After manually upgrading pip, I still get a raft of failed test. It seems > (see uploaded log) that those are due to pip advertising a deprecation of teh > format used for the database. > > One errot (on simplicial_complex.py) is genuine ; this test appasses with no > errors when run standalone (a long standing problem with this test. > > I conclude that : > - the patches pointed by Dima do solve the problem of compiling flint and > arb on Debian testing > - another problem is introduced by pip advertising. > > Questions : > - Should I package the patches that solve Trac#21782 > - Should I create a new ticket about pip's newfound verbosity ? > > HTH, > > -- > Emmanuel Charpentier > > Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 09:40:15 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > A second attempt at rebuilding after distcleant gives the same results : a > raft of errors mostly bound to pip's advertising. However, I an not sure of > what I read in the results of tolerance.py... > > I'll re-upgrade pip and post the results. > > HTH, > > -- > Emmanuel Charpentier > > > Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 03:20:26 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > Sorry for being late : I had a severe NMI from the Real World (TM). > > Using the patches pointed by Dima succeed in compiling Sage. However, I dat a > raft of failutes which mostly relate to pip being outdated. > > Updating pip "by hand" (./sage -pip install --upgrade pip) was a bad mistake > : different errors at the same point, > > I'll (make distclean && make ptestlong ) again overnight and post the > hopefully clean) log tomorrow. > > HTH, > > PS : about penalties for abusing compilers : did you consider this ? > > -- > Emmanuel Charpentier > > Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 01:04:36 UTC+1, François a écrit : > Apologies if you missed my later post. I had read the patch in reverse. > You do the correct thing and they cripple it. In a curious way too. > > I suspect they do PIE (position independent executable - a relative of PIC) > wrong. > > +1 about having severe penalties for crippling compilers. > > François > > > On 6/11/2016, at 12:19, 'Bill Hart' via sage-release > > <sage-r...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > On 5 November 2016 at 20:11, Francois Bissey <francoi...@canterbury.ac.nz> > > wrote: > > That was clearly a mistake in flint/arb in the first place. “-r” is a flag > > for the linker, not sure what gcc was doing with it in the first place. > > > > -Wl is supposed to pass the option to the linker. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > <ptestlong.log> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
