On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:45 PM Eric Gourgoulhon <egourgoul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 18:07:16 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 3:31:07 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 01:00:29 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Another question: does Flint pass its test suite on these machines?
>>>
>>>
>>> How could I run this test suite?
>>>
>>> Eric.
>>
>>
>> "sage -f -c flint"
>>
>
> Thanks for the tip.
> Being out of office, I ran the test suite on another computer (Core i7-6700HQ 
> + 16 GB RAM, running Ubuntu 18.04.2), which shows the same doctest failure 
> with Python3 Sage 8.9.beta5.
> The test suite seems passed, with many messages like
> [flint-2.5.2.p4] zz_pX_to_fmpz_mod_poly....PASS
> [flint-2.5.2.p4] zz_pE_to_fq....PASS
> [flint-2.5.2.p4] zz_pEX_to_fq_poly....PASS
> (I did not see any "FAILED") and at the end:
> [flint-2.5.2.p4] Successfully installed flint-2.5.2.p4
> [flint-2.5.2.p4] Deleting temporary build directory
> [flint-2.5.2.p4] /home/eric/sage/py3/local/var/tmp/sage/build/flint-2.5.2.p4
> [flint-2.5.2.p4] Finished installing flint-2.5.2.p4.spkg
>
> Side note: the "./sage -f -c flint" command continued with
>
> New packages may have been installed.
> Re-running configure and make in case any dependent packages need updating.
>
> and then proceeded by installing
>
> arb-2.16.0.p0
> eclib-20190226
> linbox-1.6.3
> singular-4.1.1p2.p0
> pynac-0.7.24.p0
> sagelib-8.9.beta5
>
> Just in case, after "./sage -f -c flint", I run
> ./sage  -t --long src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx
> and get the same error:
>
> File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx", line 2055, in 
> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group
> Failed example:
>     G = f.galois_group(); G
> Expected:
>     Transitive group number 5 of degree 4
> Got:
>     Exception (FLINT memory_manager). Unable to allocate memory.
>     Transitive group number 5 of degree 4
>
> Again, on the very same computer, this doctest is passed with Python 2 Sage 
> 8.9.beta5.

It's possible this is similar to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28106 simply insofar as some test is
bumping up against the default 3300MB virtual memory limit imposed by
the test runner.

Which doesn't necessarily mean there isn't a problem: If some test is
using a lot more memory than it used to, such that it's bumping up
against that limit, there might be a leak or some other unintended
memory usage consequence to the way a test was written....

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAOTD34ZObtAs0vFmSR8-qk63qRT4Xpq-Ku1KspHEohHA--%2BNtQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to