Hi, On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 12:50:18PM -0700, Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 8:59:43 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > > > I don't see any major issues for 9.1 any more, so we should soon have the > > first rc. If you have anything that you thing should go in then now is the > > time to finish it up ;-) > > > > 6a4580546f (tag: 9.1.beta9, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to > > 9.1.beta9 > > > > > Let me remark that this is the first beta that tries to use the system > python3 in a venv (#27824) instead of building our own copy of python3. > Tests of building from scratch or (after "make python3-clean") would be > valuable.
Do you suggest all of us to make distclean and ptestlong ? Ciao, Thierry > > I ran tests (make build ptest) at > https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/actions/runs/65613035 . > Full logs for all builds are available at this link. > > *Debian* (jessie/buster/bullseye/sid), *Ubuntu* > (trusty/xenial/bionic/eoan/focal)m and *LinuxMint* (19.3) are mostly clean. > > Some of the doctest failures are likely known to distribution packagers > already. If fixes for these doctests are available already, now it's time > to upstream them. > > Some doctest failures, for example ubuntu-bionic-standard ( > https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655815): > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed > > ubuntu-eoan-standard > https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655826 > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/giac.py # 2 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed > > debian-buster-standard (https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655851) > sage -t src/sage/combinat/tutorial.py # 2 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/ecm.py # 3 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/libs/libecm.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/finite_rings/element_pari_ffelt.pyx # 1 doctest > failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # 3 doctests failed > sage -t > src/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hyperelliptic_finite_field.py # 2 > doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t > src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagemath/combinat_doctest.py > > # 2 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed > > debian-bullseye-standard (https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/542655863) > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/r.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/tachyon.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py # 2 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/lfunctions/pari.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/maxima.py # Timed out > sage -t src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py # 8 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py # 2 doctests > failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # 3 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py # 2 doctests > failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx # Timed out > sage -t src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py # 3 doctests > failed > sage -t src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/height.py # 6 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/schemes/plane_conics/con_number_field.py # 1 doctest > failed > sage -t src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed > > > *Fedora* (26-32), *Centos* (7-8): > > Fedora 26: clean > > Fedora 27, 28, 29: Critical test failures in sage.combinat, likely because > of symmetrica https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29405 > > Fedora 30 and 31: Doctest build error related to eclib > > Fedora 32: Build errors with various packages. Fedora 32 already ships gcc > 10! > > Centos 7 and 8: clean > > > *Arch Linux*: clean > > *Slackware: *Build error with freetype; > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29373 needs review > > *macOS:* > > homebrew-macos-minimal: > sage -t src/sage/interfaces/gap.py # 1 doctest failed > sage -t src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # 3 doctests failed > sage -t src/sage/sets/recursively_enumerated_set.pyx # 2 doctests failed > > homebrew-macos-standard: > pynac build error - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29404 needs review > > homebrew-conda-forge-minimal: > gfan build error - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28984 > > homebrew-conda-forge-standard: > numpy build error > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/63f61392-1ddc-4047-ab52-4a7c8095a58b%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/20200330134729.wugmv2xoo6leseak%40metelu.net.
