Dear William, On Feb 22, 1:58 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I rename it to tensor.sage (not sure if this is a good idea), > > Yes, that's a VERY GOOD idea. It's really crazy to use a compiled > spyx for the purposes of interfacing with the Singular interpreter > via pexpect.
Sorry, using a compiled spyx was just, well, let's call it my personal tradition. Am i right that the loop must be re-written if it is .sage rather than .spyx? I think for i from 1<=i<=len(L[2]): is only possible in .spyx, while in .sage it should be for i in range(1,len(L[2])+1) @John, this would explain the new error message after renaming the file. However, i don't know why attaching the .spyx didn't work. Yours Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---