Thanks a lot, that should work. I will have to do the symbolic
derivations first and then convert the results into python functions
before doing numerical computations.
Cheers
Stan
On Jun 5, 1:23 pm, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a somewhat different solution that you might like more:
>
> sage: var('x,a,b')
> sage: def f(x):
> return 2*x^a + b
>
> sage: f(x)
> 2*x^a + b
>
> sage: a = 2; f(x)
> 2*x^2 + b
>
> sage: b = 1; f(x)
> 2*x^2 + 1
>
> The fact that f is a python function instead of a SymbolicArithmetic
> object has both advantages and disadvantages. I prefer it because I
> have a better understanding of the basic python objects.
>
> Cheers,
> Marshall Hampton
>
> On Jun 5, 5:36 am, Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dear Robert,
>
> > Thanks a lot for the quick solution. That's a whole new support
> > experience!
>
> > I was hoping I could define
> > z=y.subs(locals())
> > so that z would automatically adapt if the local variables change, but
> > it does not. Every time I change the local variables, I have to
> > redefine z=y.subs(locals())
> > to update it. Whereas this is better than writing y(a=3,b=4), it would
> > be even more convenient if I could define a function that
> > automatically takes the actual local variables.
> > Almost there...
>
> > Thanks again,
> > Stan
>
> > On Jun 5, 11:47 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 5, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Stan wrote:
>
> > > > Dear all,
>
> > > > I would like to use Sage as an alternative to Mathematica and I am
> > > > quite amazed about the demonstrated functionality of Sage. I just have
> > > > a very basic problem with the way I am used to do calculations. Often,
> > > > I define a set of equations with different variables in them, then I
> > > > solve the equations for example for y, set some of the variables to
> > > > prescribed values and plot y as a function of the free variable. In
> > > > Sage, a symbolic function does not replace the variables by numbers if
> > > > the variables have values assigned to them.
>
> > > > Example:
>
> > > > sage: var ('x a b')
> > > > (x, a, b)
> > > > sage: y=2*x^a+b
> > > > sage: a=3;b=4
> > > > sage: y
> > > > 2*x^a + b
> > > > sage: y(a=3,b=4)
> > > > 2*x^3 + 4
>
> > > > In the above example, y only uses the values of a and b if they are
> > > > explicitly included in the call. This would become very tedious for a
> > > > system of equations if I want to plot several of them with the same
> > > > parameter values.
>
> > > > Is there a way of formulating equations that will automatically
> > > > evaluate if their variables have values assigned to them?
>
> > > I would try something like
>
> > > sage: var ('x a b')
> > > (x, a, b)
> > > sage: y=2*x^a+b
> > > sage: a=3;b=4
> > > sage: y
> > > 2*x^a + b
> > > sage: y.subs(locals())
> > > 2*x^3 + 4
>
> > > This will take all the local variables (with their names) and plug
> > > their values in.
>
> > > > Same example in Mathematica:
>
> > > > In[282]:=
> > > > y=2*x^a+b
>
> > > > Out[282]=
> > > > b + 2 x^a
>
> > > > In[283]:=
> > > > a=3;b=4;
> > > > y
>
> > > > Out[284]=
> > > > 4 + 2 x^3
>
> > > > Thanks for your help!
>
> > > > Stan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
