Martin Albrecht wrote: > On Friday 29 August 2008, Jason Grout wrote: >> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> >> We could have _c_NTL_init_ or _c_blas_init_, etc., for variants if >> people want. Another thought is to pass options to the systems, like >> _c_init_('blas','NTL','singular'). > > That looks like an infinite amount of work compared to very little benefit. > Anybody interested in writing code for these libraries, can look at our > sources to see how we link into them. I doubt automatic code generation would > be of much use here. I agree. I certainly am not volunteering to do that sort of thing; just pointing out that if we really wanted to, we could probably generate code that would use various libraries to give C more capabilities. Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---