Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Martin Albrecht wrote:

> 
>> We could have _c_NTL_init_ or _c_blas_init_, etc., for variants if
>> people want.  Another thought is to pass options to the systems, like
>> _c_init_('blas','NTL','singular').
> 
> That looks like an infinite amount of work compared to very little benefit. 
> Anybody interested in writing code for these libraries, can look at our 
> sources to see how we link into them. I doubt automatic code generation would 
> be of much use here.

I agree. I certainly am not volunteering to do that sort of thing; just 
pointing out that if we really wanted to, we could probably generate 
code that would use various libraries to give C more capabilities.

Jason


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to