>> I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so >> "by extension SR" means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I. > > I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the > embedding into SR, QQbar, ComplexField(1000), etc. The embedding will > actually be into the "complex lazy field."
Can you write a paragraph or two about these new lazy fields you've been implementing? William -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
