On Feb 23, 7:57 pm, Carl Witty <carl.wi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 23, 6:54 pm, Alex Raichev <tortoise.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Carl, regarding the parenthetical remark of your first reply, are you > > saying the coercion error for plain old monomials below is supposed to > > happen? > > Well, I wouldn't say "supposed to happen" because I don't think this > is the way it should stay long-term. But yes, it's expected; that > functionality is not yet implemented.
I've posted a wishlist request for coercions from number fields with embedding into QQbar. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5355 Carl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
