On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Stephen Hartke<har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Might this be related to how binomial is evaluated using GiNaC? Similar > problems occur when replacing binomial with log.
Valgrind says yes: ==26568== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 35 of 3,312 ==26568== at 0x4026FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==26568== by 0x71A0270: __pyx_f_4sage_5rings_7integer_fast_tp_new (integer.c:28497) ==26568== by 0x719B3DF: __pyx_f_4sage_5rings_7integer_8int_to_Z__call_ (integer.c:28008) ==26568== by 0x5AB90AA: __pyx_pf_4sage_9structure_6parent_6Parent___call__ (parent.c:4130) ==26568== by 0x805D596: PyObject_Call (abstract.c:1861) ==26568== by 0x80CCFB4: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:3823) ==26568== by 0x80D0104: PyEval_EvalCodeEx (ceval.c:2875) ==26568== by 0x8116CF0: function_call (funcobject.c:517) ==26568== by 0x805D596: PyObject_Call (abstract.c:1861) ==26568== by 0x806377E: instancemethod_call (classobject.c:2519) ==26568== by 0x805D596: PyObject_Call (abstract.c:1861) ==26568== by 0x7E681FC: __pyx_f_4sage_5rings_10polynomial_18polynomial_element_10Polynomial__hash_c (polynomial_element.c:8163) ==26568== by 0x7DE8301: __pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_10polynomial_18polynomial_element_10Polynomial___hash__ (polynomial_element.c:8113) ==26568== by 0x949106F: __pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_12number_field_30number_field_element_quadratic_28NumberFieldElement_quadratic___hash__(_object*) (number_field_element_quadratic.cpp:7281) ==26568== by 0xAA1F7FA: GiNaC::Number_T::hash() const (numeric.cpp:797) ==26568== by 0xAA1F94F: GiNaC::numeric::calchash() const (numeric.cpp:1788) ==26568== by 0xA919E5A: GiNaC::basic::is_equal(GiNaC::basic const&) const (basic.h:264) ==26568== by 0xA9ED4B5: GiNaC::mul::eval(int) const (ex.h:348) ==26568== by 0xA947B9C: GiNaC::ex::construct_from_basic(GiNaC::basic const&) (ex.cpp:312) ==26568== by 0xAA26E21: GiNaC::operator*(GiNaC::ex const&, GiNaC::ex const&) (ex.h:267) ==26568== by 0xA9A5B38: GiNaC::exp_eval(GiNaC::ex const&) (inifcns_trans.cpp:83) ==26568== by 0xA96102C: GiNaC::function::eval(int) const (function.cpp:1388) ==26568== by 0xA947B9C: GiNaC::ex::construct_from_basic(GiNaC::basic const&) (ex.cpp:312) ==26568== by 0xAB09757: __pyx_pf_4sage_8symbolic_10expression_10Expression_exp(_object*, _object*) (ex.h:267) ==26568== by 0x80CE962: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:3596) -- Carlo Hamalainen http://carlo-hamalainen.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
