.sage files are not meant to be used like normal Python modules. You can only load or attach them. I implemented this in 2005, when I was basically "implementing something like Magma" on top of Python. I'm not sure this is good or bad, but I definitely findsage: attach file.sage to be *useful* in practice.
Yep, "attach" is really usefull. However I've some big bunches of code using sage divided in several packages and I thus have to name them .py :) And then I have to use the "difficult" syntax.
It's not really an issue, but when I began I has some difficulties to understand why some pieces of code was working in a context and nonworking in an other.
Have a good afternoon, Laurent -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
