> Basically, I have a function F(a, b) that is real for all positive > values of a and b (where a < b). When b->oo one of the terms in the > equation tends to zero. Depending how this original function F was > calculated this either caused sage to successfully take the limit and
Only because it's defined as an integral :) It's an interesting example. > return the real result, or alternatively crash with a 0*oo error. Do > you think that it would be better behavior to first try/catch the > error involving the infinity and attempt to take the limit? Hmm, good question. Part of this would depend on whether it slows things down significantly to try/except here. It's worth opening a ticket for, if you're interested in this behavior; discussion could continue there. Go to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ and sign up for an account, then open a "new ticket" once you're approved - welcome aboard! - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
