On 2012-06-03 12:14, Martin Albrecht wrote: > 2) K.multiplicative_generator() currently returns a random generator, but for > the GivaroGFq implementation we should simply return the generator which has > internal representation '1', i.e., the guy we actually use to represent the > elements. Once this done log_repr() will also start to make sense again. On the other hand, doing this for the Givaro interface but not for the PARI interface (where logs are never used) is also confusing. I would say: leave things as they are. Note that the generator is not "random", it is deterministic.
-- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
