On Sunday, 5 April 2015 13:20:49 UTC+1, absinthe wrote:
>
> Justin thanks for your reply. When I realised that I have posted to dev I 
> deleted the message and I posted to support. It looks like that you had 
> already answered there. Since it might help others which will look at 
> support and not dev, I copy and paste your dev reply here.
> 2. Yes no problem :)
> 1. The reason I resulted to Integers(p) was that I couldn't have the 
> proper cooefficients when using GF.
> For the same "configuration" I tried the following
> Trying with the following 
> p=32
> N=100
> FFQ.<t> = GF(q)#FiniteField(q)
> PR.<x> = PolynomialRing(K)
> Q.<xx> = PR.quotient(x^N - 1)
> pp=Q.random_element()
> while True:
>     try:
>         ppInv=pp.inverse_mod(xx^N-1)
>         break
>     except:
>         pp=Q.random_element()
> print (pp*ppInv).mod(x^N-1)
>
> I get to a dead end as inverse_mod returns me a not implemented error 
> (sage-6.3-x86_64-Linux)
>

What is K there? And what is q?
They are not defined in your code above.

As well, 
it's not clear why you try to call inverse_mod(), as pp is already an 
element
of the quotient ring modulo (x^N-1).

But pp^{-1} need not exist, still, as Q is not a field for each N>1.



On Sunday, April 5, 2015 at 3:59:42 AM UTC+3, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2015, at 17:25 , absinthe wrote: 
>
> > Dear all, 
> > 
> > I'm trying to work with polynomials modulo x^N-1 whose coefficients 
> belong 
> > to Z_p (If it helps p is a power of a prime). I know that I'm doing 
> > something wrong, but I cannot figure out what so any help is welcome. 
>
> I'm not sure how familiar you are with this stuff, so forgive me if this 
> is already clear to you. 
>
> 1. When "p" is a prime power, Z/pZ is not a field (it's a ring, but not a 
> domain).  If you want to deal with coefficients in a field, then you will 
> want to use "GF(p)", not "Integers(p)".  And a minor syntactic wrinkle to 
> beware of is that when "p" (as above) is a prime power, and not a prime, 
> you need a second argument, to be used as the name of the "generator" of 
> F_p (as an extension of F_q, q being the prime in p). 
>
> 2. Also, in computer algebra systems, you have to be careful about 
> parentheses, to get what you want.  In particular, "X^N-1" and X^(N-1)" are 
> not the same. 
>
> If this isn't helpful, we can look at this some more. 
>
> HTH 
>
> Justin 
>
> -- 
> Justin C. Walker 
> Curmudgeon at Large 
> Director 
> Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income 
> -- 
> Build a man a fire and he'll be warm 
>  for a night. 
> Set a man on fire and he'll be warm 
>  for the rest of his life. 
>
>
>
> On Sunday, April 5, 2015 at 4:00:47 AM UTC+3, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2015, at 17:29 , absinthe wrote: 
>>
>> > Dear all, 
>> > 
>> > I'm trying to work with polynomials modulo x^N-1 whose coefficients 
>> belong 
>> > to Z_p (If it helps p is a power of a prime). I know that I'm doing 
>> > something wrong, but I cannot figure out what so any help is welcome. 
>>
>> Answered, possibly, on sage-devel... 
>>
>> -- 
>> Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large 
>> Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds 
>> ----------- 
>> My wife 'n kids 'n dogs are gone, 
>> I can't get Jesus on the phone, 
>> But Ol' Milwaukee's Best is my best friend. 
>> ----------- 
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to