Come to think of it, I just spotted a little bug in libgap: sage: p= Permutation([ (1, 2, 3), (4, 5) ]) sage: pp= libgap( p ); pp
[ 2, 3, 1, 5, 4 ] Here pp is a list, not a permutation ! GAP should respond (1,2,3)(4,5), regardless of Sage's default behaviour of printing permutations as lists. Of course one can use libgap.eval( p.cycle_string() ) but that's awkward. As is libgap.PermList( p ) Pierre -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
