You say: "hijack vs shut up, which one is more serious? Accusing someone hijacking something is a very serious accusation."
I certainly didn't mean it as a 'very serious accusation' like hijacking people or planes. I used the term "hijacked" as a technical term like it is defined in the urban dictionary: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thread%20Hijacking I'm sorry if it reached you differently, in a stronger sense. You say: "And not a completely different topic." I deny this. It didn't add anything to the topic. My question was excellently answered, and in all your posts and those of the experts not the slightest new information has been added to the original question. Why? Because you have a completely different topic. In your own words: "Hi, I’m trying to translate this Sage syntax to Python syntax Do you think it is realistic to use sage as a Python library and completely not using sage (as an interpreter) itself?" Does this has anything to do with the question of how to calculate efficiently with the Quaternion algebra? In your own words, a recommendation you gave above to someone who wanted to help you: "But if you're reading carefully this isn't what I'm asking." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
