On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 12:24:38 AM UTC-7, rana-aere wrote: > > Thank you for clear instructions. > I used the codes to compare how doctoring of the method _macaulay2_init_ > is displayed. > > sage-8.9 (command line and jupyter) > > ``` > Init docstring: x.__init__(...) initializes x; see help(type(x)) for > signature > File: > /Applications/SageMath-8.9.app/Contents/Resources/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx > Type: builtin_function_or_method > ``` > > sage-9.0 (command line and jupyter ) > > ``` > Signature: S._macaulay2_init_(macaulay2=None) > Docstring: > EXAMPLES: > > Quotients of multivariate polynomial rings over QQ, ZZ and a > finite field: > ``` > > sage-9.1 (command line and jupyter) > > ``` > Signature: S._macaulay2_init_(macaulay2=None) > Docstring: > EXAMPLES: > > Quotients of multivariate polynomial rings over \QQ, \ZZ and a > finite field: > ``` > > All three have different behaviors. >
The difference between Sage 8.9 and 9.0 is probably due to the switch from Python 2 to Python 3. > > I think true and meaningful difference should be observed in conversion to > tutorial, wiki or manual.... > I don't consider these differences meaningful. What are you concerned about? > If someone knows how to test it, please tell me the result. > Test what, exactly? > I will find a way to make a ticket for it. > > For now I proceed to check issues on "sqrt?" > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/0d0dcb1d-84bb-41ad-b247-8aa7a296922c%40googlegroups.com.
