Hi,

I release cocalc-docker ([1], [2]) a few days ago with sage-9.4, and had 
people reporting back "illegal instruction" issues.  Sage is built there 
with SAGE_FAT_BINARY="yes", using this script [3].  One person who reported 
a problem had a "Dell PowerEdge R710." and I built on an intel Dell 
PowerEdge R630, for what it is worth.  They got the error "An illegal 
instructor occurred" when computing "5+2" in Sage. 

My solution for now is to keep cocalc-docker at sage-9.3 for the time 
being, and suggest that people build sage from source on their own machine 
if necessary.   I'll let you know if I have any further information, but I 
just wanted to add this data point.

[1] https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-docker
[2] https://hub.docker.com/r/sagemathinc/cocalc
[3] 
https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-docker/blob/master/scripts/install_sage.sh

On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 8:57:44 AM UTC-7 Marco Streng wrote:

> In the end I build 9.4 from source and that worked perfectly. And it 
> turned out that the Ubuntu 18.04 binaries of 9.2 also work on this 
> particular machine (though we went for 9.4 in the end). Thanks again for 
> the help.
>
> Op dinsdag 24 augustus 2021 om 18:03:01 UTC+2 schreef slelievre:
>
>> 2021-08-24 05:48 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>> >
>> > These "illegal instruction" errors are an indication
>> > that the binary was built for a more advanced CPU
>> > than yours - which does not support certain CPU
>> > commands. It's a bug in "fat binary" build process
>> > we see for some time.
>> >
>> > Build Sage yourself, or use Conda.
>>
>> I opened a ticket at binary-pkg for that:
>> https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg/issues/31
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/b7d09d6d-c42f-49d4-8b75-2526b9f31020n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to