Sorry, I just noticed that A+B works.

What about intersections? A*B does not seem to be implemented.

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 03:05, G. M.-S. <lists....@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hello.
>
> Is it possible to define a binary operation ∪ such that
> A ∪ B
> gives
> A.union(B)
> with the latter taking care of all problems (not a Set, etc.)?
>
> And if so, would it be possible to have an n-ary operation (n > 1) such
> that for instance
> A ∪ B ∪ C
> gives
> A.union(B).union(C)
> without having to write (A ∪ B) ∪ C ?
>
> Guillermo
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/CANnG18_Y8E1B8hgSRnB2Xv_vtr%2BjWspG-J546CwH4_CFeNTbvQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to