Setuju bro .... pada akhirnya, tergantung market saja....
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:42 AM, ki_4ever888 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > @all: market always rite.. gak ada harga wajar / tdk wajar di market ! > cheap buy more, high sell more :D > > --- On *Mon, 4/11/11, katrin® <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: katrin® <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [saham] Goldman Sachs: SELL Astra International! > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, April 11, 2011, 11:28 PM > > > > > Coba di cek lagi deh dengan kondisi terakhir :d > > ASII may've taken a wrong turn with untr tuh :d Commodity bukan keahlian > mereka deh kayaknya :d > All those investment cost without apparent investment timeframe :d Tapi > kalau sukses sih berarti ASII punya kaki kuat banget :d > > Btw, IBM ajah sebesar itu salah posisi jadi jebol :d > > Sent with Love....:d > ------------------------------ > *From: * ZFQ <[email protected]> > *Sender: * [email protected] > *Date: *Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:20:26 +0700 > *To: *<[email protected]> > *ReplyTo: * [email protected] > *Subject: *Re: [saham] Goldman Sachs: SELL Astra International! > > > > Siapa bilang ASII udh terlalu mahal... klo menurut hitungan bang Ian bbrp > waktu lalu, ASII malah harusnya harganya diatas 60.000, hrg skr malah lg > discount itungannya > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Muhammad Satria > <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Saya setuju dengan Mr. Positif kali ini. ASII udah terlalu mahal. Yang > sudah cuan, mending > > sell dulu aja. Tampung / beli balik di 49 ribu. > > > 2011/4/12 positif01 > <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > > > > > > GS memo on Astra International known for ASII at IDX is still being kept > intact since March 28, 2011. No further adjustment needed in near future as > the main catalyst of auto-industry, Japan's economic outlook, would still > take a long road for a better improvement. > > ASII is cut from Neutral to SELL with price target of Rp49.000 citing > higher auto taxes, supply constraints after Japan’s disaster and increased > cost pressures. > > '+' > > > > >
