Being a master would indeed be an enterprise feature..being a slave can be a
standard feature however...

Remember it were "thoughts".....


dirk.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Kevin Stone
Sent: Mon Jun 02 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] A question...


That would seem to an "Enterprise" edition only feature...

-Kevin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 5:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] A question...
>
>
> That would ofcourse be one of the checks that SA would
> internaly do :-)
>
>
> dirk.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Paul Ockenden
> Sent: Sun Jun 01 9:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SA-list] A question...
>
>
>
> That's the sort of thing that would be BRILLIANT to have in
> SA. If I were you, though, I'd make sure that when running in
> 'multiple' mode like, this, the masters and slaves all have
> to be properly licenced copies, not the freebie version. That
> way it would protect your revenue stream.
>
> Good luck with the house and office moves!!!!
>
> P.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 7:40 PM
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] A question...
>
>
> > Well you did make me think...and that on a Sunday evening ...
> >
> > My thoughts:
> > "
> > SA can operate in 3 modes:
> > * normal (as it is now)
> > * master
> > * slave
> >
> > on the SA_master you define who are the slaves.  For each entry you
> > can define who are the entries on the slave(s) that are linked.
> > (master_UID_7 has a slave slave_01_UID_45 and slave_02_UID_56) When
> > SA_master checks UID_7 it will after the check query sa_slave_01 to
> > get the status of uid_45 and it will also query sa_slave_02
> to get the
> > status of uid_56.  The query will be done via an SSH like
> connection
> > that will be kept open during the "running" of sa_master
> (ofcourse if
> > the connection is dropped for whatever reason, we will remake the
> > connection).
> >
> > on the master you define within the alerts that ALL slaves must be
> > down
> too
> > OR "at least y slaves must be down too" and this in
> combination with
> > the normal alerting rules based on the status on the sa_master.
> >
> >
> > on the add/edit entry screen on sa_master you will be able
> to select
> > the corresponding slave entries via a list/dropdown/...
> (list will be
> > read at startup of the master, with an update button on the
> GUI -> in
> > order no to have too much network traffic).
> >
> >
> >
> > on the sa_slave stations you can define what sa_masters are
> allowed to
> > connect, and the connection will need authentication (like the
> > "normal" connection to the ssh server of SA). "
> >
> > Those are my thoughts on the "issue".
> >
> > Timeframe for implementation?  Unknown :-)  Not directly, too busy
> > with other things (like moving to a new house and to a new office).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > dirk.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Paul Ockenden
> > Sent: Sun Jun 01 7:54 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SA-list] A question...
> >
> >
> > > Little remark on the "big boy" monitoring systems.
> > > * compare the cost
> > > * they use agents on the system that are monitored (->
> roll-out is
> > > not
> > easy
> > > by that)
> > > * compare the support
> >
> > Oh, I know, I know. I was simply wondering whether anyone
> had set up a
> > multiple SA checker system, where part of the checks
> involved checking
> > the web pages produced by the other SA monitoring points.
> Sounds to me
> > like it COULD be done - I was just wondering if anyone was actually
> > doing it.
> >
> > P.
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> >
> > [incoming email checked]
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
>

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive



To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

Reply via email to