Thanks, but that still doesn't get around the issue of checks that never change 
status, or how long they have been in their current status.

Mike

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/06/03 02:15PM >>>
>From a post long ago, far away.. (see attachement)






________________________
Roland Gaspar
Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603






________________________
Roland Gaspar
Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603






________________________
Roland Gaspar
Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603



>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/24/03 1:53:19 PM >>>
Well, what if you saved and reloaded the same information you're
writing to the table now? I'm not sure how you calculate that data
internally. That would allow for the cumulative totals to keep
increasing. But that would hide the fact that there was a period of time
that the checks weren't done and is therefore unknown. If SA were down
for a day or two, the %'s would be vastly affected. 

Now that we've been chatting about it, I'm not sure that changing the
Statistics table is the right way to go, since what I need is pretty
different than what is currently being processed. I think I actually
want the new table shown below. Come to think of it, I don't really need
the actual minutes spent in each state, just the xx.xxx% of total time
for each datetime period. Can I request a new type of output table?

Mike

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/24/03 12:30PM >>>
Again that's not the question....

What exactly should be kept of the stats over a shutdown of SA....


dirk.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Fri Oct 24 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Statistical database question....


Maybe a new database table with output set on it's own semi-daily
schedule and on shutdown? 

Host | HostID | DateTimeRangeStart | DateTimeRangeEnd | Status 1
minutes
| status 2 minutes | status 3 minutes | Status 4 minutes | status 5
minutes | status 6 minutes  | status 7 minutes 

That's ultimately the table I'd need to create from existing data.

Mike

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/24/03 09:48AM >>>
The only time SA misses data is if the stats changes while SAlive is
shut down.

I do agree it is a problem if devices don't ever go down, they don't
get
an entry but you can then assume that it is 100% up.  It would be nice
to keep track of the number of hosts checked each cycle or to keep an
average host entry count...I created a perl script that can run in ASP
to parse the stat log and just have a stat at the bottom that anything
not listed was at 100%. I have been playing around with the idea that
at
the end of each month, I automagically generate a copy of the current
hosts file for Servers Alive, so up to a granularity of a month, I can
list all the servers checked for that month and include it is my
output.

I wonder if dirk, would consider adding a feature that would append
the
list of hosts in the SAlive host file to the monthly stat log when he
rotates the logs monthly?

Dirk?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Statistical database question....
> 
> Well, the columns you currently write are fine, BUT....
> 
> I have been tasked to create monthly / annual UP/DOWN stats for the 
> major devices. What I do now is sum all of the minutes where the 
> previousstatus is X. The problem comes in that SA doesn't regularly 
> output state stats to this table. I only see entries if there has
been

> a change in status. So, unless my network is a complete piece of 
> trash, most of the devices never get any entries. Also, like I said,
a

> close/open of SA resets all of SA's internal time stamps so that if a

> change does occur, the output only reflects from when SA was last 
> restarted.
> 
> If SA output stats during a graceful shutdown, and on a regular time

> schedule (say a few times a day (midnight, noon)) then I can use your

> table as is. Otherwise, I need to perform the metrics calculations on

> the interchange table, which will be a lengthy process if they ask me

> for the last years stats, and I have been writing every 5 minutes.
> 
> I can't see any issue with a previous and current status entry being

> the same, but maybe a new column to explain more exactly why the 
> record was written would be helpful.
> 
> Mike
> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/24/03 06:04AM >>>
> What exact info should be kept?
> 
> 
> 
> dirk.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

> Behalf Of Michael Shook
> Sent: Thu Oct 23 10:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: [SA-list] Statistical database question....
> 
> 
> If I understand the process correctly, when the first cycle is run on

> the start of SA you gather a status and datetime. When the status 
> changes, the duration is calculated, the datetime is reset, the new 
> status is recorded. Then an appropriate entry is written to the 
> database.
> 
> If that's correct, then when SA is stopped/restarted, all of the 
> "running time" info is lost from the last program start or last
status

> change.
> 
> Would it be possible to output all of the current "running time" info

> for each check to the database before SA shuts down (assuming a 
> gracefull shutdown)? Maybe record the current status as the same for

> both last and new.
> 
> I'm trying to get the most out of this database, but I can't
calculate

> an accurate quality % if I don't have all of the up times.
> 
> Thanks!!!!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Michael Shook
> Business Continuity Analyst
> Saddle Creek Corporation
> 723 Joe Tamplin Industrial Blvd
> Macon GA  31217
> 478 742 8740 ext. 105 (work)
> 478 256 9318 (mobile)
> 478 742 7917 (fax)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://www.saddlecrk.com 
> 
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
> 
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] c0 
> Sent: Friday, Oct
> With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive


This email and its contents may be confidential.  If it is and you are
not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the
information within this email or its attachments.  If you have
received
this email in error, please delete it immediately.  Thank you.


To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive



To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:tm when SA was last 
> restarted.
   unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive
xxxxxxxx
Ce message a TtT analysT par Guinevere2 et McAfee
This message was Scanned by Guinevere2 and McAfee
http://nt.patlq.com/guinevere 
Questions? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
xxxxxxxx


ZIP  attachment type(s) blocked 
***
This message contained attachments that have been blocked by Guinevere. Please see 
your system administrator for more details.
Ce message contenait un (ou des) attachements qui ont TtT bloquT par Guinevere. Pour 
plus de dTtails, contactez votre administrateur de rTseaux.
Questions? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
***

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

Reply via email to