Testing on Win2K with 2 proc is possible, doing it under
W2003 isn't possible.
We only have one dual proc in the office and that's a
production Win2K system.
Dirk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Riggs
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 4:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3
Dirk,
Interesting comment for John Rosiak. I'm running on a duel proc
PIII with windows 2000AS. Very well could be a thread handling situation.
Was the testing for Windows 2000 done on a duel proc? I wouldn't expect that
however, it would be nice to know as I can do some testing under W2K3 on a duel
proc and see how behaves overall (with plug-ins).
-William
Dirk Bulinckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Normaly not.
Since the pops50.ocx is only used for the smtp2pop3 addon.
Dirk.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Nate Morris
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3
Mine is a single-processor 350 MHz desktop machine running Windows 2000
Professional with SP4 and patches (SA and the OS are the only things running
on this machine).
A long time ago I thought I heard someone mention that this problem cropped
up when they started using the EventLog check, but I can't find that message
any more. Could there be another COM check that is interfering with this
one?
Nate
>From: "Rosiak, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:46:20 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from woodstone.nu ([208.255.176.2]) by mc10-f30.hotmail.com with
>Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:53:39 -0800
>Received: from corp148mr3-2.mcgraw-hill.com [198.45.18.167] by twinstar.com
>with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.15) id AB0E1F40122; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:48:30 -0500
>Received: from unknown (HELO cp148hex09.cp.mhc.mhc) (152.159.243.63) by
>corp148mr3-2.mcgraw-hill.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2004 14:48:32 -0500
>Received: from CPEXCH1.cp.mhc.mhc ([152.159.243.52]) by
>cp148hex09.cp.mhc.mhc with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 17 Nov
>2004 14:46:21 -0500
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jHbrYc5LYqqhOk06i+EGKtL
>X-Ironport-AV: i="3.87,94,1099285200"; d="scan'217,208";
>a="250328072:sNHT111752948"
>Priority: normal
>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3
>thread-index: AcTM0tOwQYQhWrmpSPWNKqs8f4lIUwAAk6agAADvN0AAAEJiQAAA9j5g
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2004 19:46:21.0481 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[1D03C990:01C4CCDE]
>X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: "Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]" [2-5-2800]
>X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [198.45.18.167]
>X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for
>spam.
>X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE
>Precedence: bulk
>
>I originally reported this problem a number of months ago. I now run the
>SMTP2OP3 code on another W2K machine that has only 1 CPU. My previous
>machine has 2 CPUs and I encountered the same problem after about 100 or
>so checks. Since both machines are W2K and patched at the same levels, I
>can only assume that the CPU number has something to do with it.
>
>
>
>Good Luck,
>
>John
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:16 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3
>
>
>
>Tests have been done on different OSes, one of them was Windows 2000
>
>
>
>Dirk.
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Jason Passow
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:09 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3
>
>I am running Windows 2000. Do you think the version of windows affects
>this issue?
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:43 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3
>
>
>
>We tried it a lot of cycles and never saw that problem.
>
>Somehow the OS looses track of the OCX that is used within the COM
>check, I realy don't know/understand why
>
>
>
>Dirk.
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of William Riggs
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 7:26 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3
>
>Dirk, responding back. This is the version for the plug-in (smtp2pop3)
>v1.0.0.21 - 26-AUG-2004 off the website. The version of SA is 4.1.1609
>
>-William
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>
> Dirk,
>
>
>
> This looked me up this morning:
>
>
>
> INBOUND MAILFLOW CHECK is DOWN ERR docheck : Component
>'pops50.ocx' or one of its dependencies not correctly registered: a file
>is missing or invalid( 339- 0)
>
> Mail generated by Servers Alive at Wednesday, November 17, 2004
>12:07:17 AM.
>
> No changes. It's been running for two weeks without errors. The
>server is dedicated to SA and is rebooted weekly
>
> The rest of SA (and associated plug-ins) has turned in rock
>solid performance. This plug-in appears to be the primary exception
>based on previous reports to this list.
>
> Would very much like to use this again in the future, once the
>root cause is understood and resolved.
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> -William
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Discover all thats new in My Yahoo!
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>The information contained in this message is intended only for the
>recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may
>otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If
>the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
>agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
>please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is
>strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
>please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it
>from your computer.
>
>Thank you,
>The McGraw-Hill Companies
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
-------------------------
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! Try it today!
