Yes I can see the performance monitor fine on the server.

Corey

-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 10:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Perfmon CPU Check

And with the performance monitor (of Win2K) do you see them? 


Dirk.

Thanks to you the users of Servers Alive we were able to win the SunBelt
Target Award in 2002 and 2004.  
And this year (2005) they are again hosting this award.  
Help Servers Alive win it this year too and vote on
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/welcome.cfm

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Corey Schroeder
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 5:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SA-list] Perfmon CPU Check

Hello,
I have seven WIN2000 Citrix Metaframe servers.  I am running a check on
the Processors to make sure that they are not running at 100%, i.e. hung
process.  The check that I am using is NT perfmon [Processor,% Processor
Time,_Total] if greater than 99% send alert.
On two of the servers, NT perfmon Perfomance object "Processor" is not a
choice. All of the OS versions and service packs are the same.  CPU's
range from PIII 1.3ghz to Xeon w/HT 3.4ghz. The two servers that I am
having trouble with are a PIII 1.3ghz and a Xeon 2.8ghz.

Any suggestions to get the Processor performance object to show up or
other ways to accomplish this check?  

Love the software!

Corey Schroeder - Server Administrator
Roehl Transport Inc.
1916 East 29th Street
Marshfield, WI 54449
Ph. 715-591-3795 x-2004
Fax 715-591-1942
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive




To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

Reply via email to