It might do it as long as there are no other warnings or errors for that
check cycle. It seems to me if something is going wrong you may miss
errors.
Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104
"If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything at all."
Greg A Weigold wrote:
That gives me a down on a clean log, doesn't it? As well as with a log
that has some other Error or Warning event...
Maybe a combination of checks, with dependencies? If check A shows some
kind of Error or Warning message, then check B looks for the event id to be
ignored, and check C looks for all other event id's... but I'd need a way
to determine that B found the event and C didn't...
I got it! Check A looks for ANY error or warning. A down condition in
check A allows check B to run, looking for the event id to be ignored. If
B doesn't find the id it allows C to run, looking for any others... If
check B finds the ID then check C doesn't run...
That seems like it might do it...
Greg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|---------+--------------------------->
| | "Dirk Bulinckx" |
| | <dirk |
| | @woodstone.nu> |
| | Sent by: |
| | salive-owner |
| | |
| | |
| | 11/29/2005 11:55|
| | AM |
| | Please respond |
| | to salive |
|---------+--------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: <salive@woodstone.nu>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request? Or add-on change?
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Then why notuse the invert option?
Dirk.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 5:48 PM
To: salive@woodstone.nu
Subject: [SA-list] Feature request? Or add-on change?
I would like to modify the Eventlog checks... My issue is that I am
looking for any warning or error in the logs, EXCEPT specific ones... So
I'd like a check box or something that is roughly the equivalent of the
"Invert Status" box...
So when I set up a check for the Application Event log, I can input an
error id of 4409 and SA will alert on any errors or warnings (as selected)
that are NOT equal to error id 4409.
Or can someone think of a way to do this without a mod?
Thanks!
Greg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
