I can think of an example: Since we multihome servers a dependency Something like
Server X depends on Switch A or Switch B being up. Or even for our network infrastructure where a switch may be connected to multiple switches for redundancy. Switch Y depends on Switch A or Switch B It would also be handy if dependencies worked between groups (or was this already discussed?) That way I could have a group for the servers and a group for the switches but the servers could depend on the switches! -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:35 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Enhancement Requests Can you give an example on what you exactly mean? Dirk. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Riegler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:15 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] AW: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Enhancement Requests Hi, we use already dependecies. Now it is "only" possible to set one dependency for a check. Is it planed to have an option to use more than one dependency for a single check? Regards Thomas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 27. Februar 2006 16:05 An: Servers Alive Discussion List Betreff: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Enhancement Requests Don't get it. If you use dependencies then you have exactly what you want. And those are also visible within the tree. Dirk. -----Original Message----- From: Hein Kuenen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:00 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] Enhancement Requests Hi, being able to use grouping of servers better (tree-like) in the GUI, and therefore in the checks, would be such a good thing. That way the tree would stay logical and all below a down will not trigger extra responses / alerts while stil maintaining an good overview of the servers/services that belong together. I remember it being discussed before, but maybe it's possible for V6? Regards and it's still a killer app :-) Hein --- Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database: 0608-1, 23-02-2006 Checked on: 27-2-2006 16:05:39 This message has been checked for all presently known viruses. For more information about avast! virusscanning solutions please send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], check our webshop on http://shop.bizzonweb.net or alternatively call +31-40-2135853 for details on these virus products. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any documents accompanying this e-mail, contains information from the offices of TeleTrader Software AG, which may be confidential. This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this e-mail is prohibited. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please delete this e-mail and any copies or links to this e-mail completely from your system and notify us immediately so that we can ensure that no further such e-mails are sent to you. Please also keep in mind that communication via e-mail over the Internet is insecure because of third parties' possibilities to access and manipulate e-mails. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of TeleTrader Software AG. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu
