You learn something new every day... :)

The NT process checker doesn't seem to work that way (even though you
can type what you like in the field, tells me that the little_mice
process is not ok :) must feed them I guess).  

Nice to know that it works as you want though.

-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Passow
Sent: 04 August 2006 20:36
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SA-list] Monitor linux server

Makes sense except that the /print process is different each time
because it appends the directory and file name which is waiting to 
print.   I found a way to make it fail (for testing purposes) and in 
turn created the check monitoring only "/print" in the of box.   It 
turns out that this works beautifully and I now have one more thing to 
call my users about before they call me.   Server's Alive is spectacular

and has made my life exceptionally easier.  Thanks again Dirk and team. 

Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104

"If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything at
all."



Mark Perry wrote:
> You can use the *nix process monitor.
>
> I haven't tried it myself but it is basically the same as the NT 
> Process checker, click the ... Button at then end of the "of" field 
> and it should show all processes currently running on the chosen *nix
server.
> Select the relevant /print process to monitor.
>
> The NT process checker doesn't use wildards etc.  And I believe for a 
> very good reason if you specifically select a process SA will monitor 
> that process and only that process. If wildcards were allowed then SA 
> would have to iterate through the services and check each and every 
> service with a name vaguely similar to the one you want and will give 
> a down result if one is wrong... Also if wildcards were allowed then 
> potentially a * could mean anything which would never be down as all 
> processes found would be running, anything missing wouldn't be
noticed.
>
> I hope that this makes sense.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark Perry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Jason Passow
> Sent: 04 August 2006 20:06
> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
> Subject: [SA-list] Monitor linux server
>
> Let me start by saying I know next ot nothing about Linux.  I am 
> trying to find a way to use Servers Alive to do what I must do 
> manually after a phone call saying stuff isn't working.
>
> When a user calls and tells me they are unable to print from our Linux

> server application to their network printer first thing I must do is 
> go to a shell and run ps-ef | grep \/print.  If I am correct this
searches
> for running processes with the command /print in it.    Is there a way

> to monitor such a thing using the *nix process checker?   In other
wards
>
> does the *nix process checker use a substring or a full string or 
> accept wildcards?
>
>

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to
[email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office
messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the
individual members of the list that send a message.  Doing this will get
you removed from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.

Reply via email to