It is important to understand that the 1460 is returned by the OS and not SA.   
Therefore the check timeout has little to do with this error since it is 
receiving a response for the check (even it that response is a timeout).  This 
generally indicates a network problem or a problem on the remote server 
(usually the latter).   

Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
http://www.mwsco.com
jas...@mwsco.com
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Barry George [mailto:bgeo...@dougallmedia.com]
To: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu]
Sent: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:00:14 -0600
Subject: [SA-list] FW: -1 error on process check.



After restarting SA (application) a few times in an using Authentication before 
the check I can now get a 1460 error (this operation returned because the 
timeout period expired) back even with a huge timeout is specified. The failed 
check will come back long before the timeout is reached. 

 

********************************************************* 

 

I’m getting this error after rebuilding my SA box in a Win2k3 VM. I can see 
services and other checks but not Processes for some reason. The host check is 
an XP box and I can see the processes using other types of remote software. 
What have I forgotten? 

 

Barry George 

807 346-2546 

IT Department 

Dougallmedia 

 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
salive@woodstone.nu
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list.

Reply via email to