Can we have host OS spec included in those tables? It would make easier to see if problems are on specific OS.
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:00:18AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > URL: http://build.samba.org/ > > --- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2005-05-06 > 00:00:19.000000000 +0000 > +++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2005-05-07 > 00:00:18.000000000 +0000 > @@ -1,20 +1,21 @@ > -Build status as of Fri May 6 00:00:01 2005 > +Build status as of Sat May 7 00:00:01 2005 > > Build counts: > Tree Total Broken Panic > ccache 36 3 0 > distcc 36 2 0 > ppp 21 1 0 > -rsync 36 1 0 > -samba 1 0 0 > +rsync 36 2 0 > +samba 1 1 1 > samba-docs 0 0 0 > -samba4 38 20 0 > -samba_3_0 38 24 1 > +samba4 40 22 0 > +samba_3_0 38 23 1 > > Currently broken builds: > Host Tree Compiler Status > aix1 samba4 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > aix1 samba_3_0 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > +cyberone rsync gcc ok/ok/ok/ 2 > fusberta samba4 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > fusberta samba_3_0 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > samba-s390 samba4 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > @@ -22,10 +23,11 @@ > rhonwyn samba4 gcc-4.0 ok/ 2/?/? > rhonwyn samba_3_0 gcc-4.0 ok/ 2/?/? > rhonwyn samba4 tcc ok/ 2/?/? > -superego samba_3_0 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > shelob ccache icc ok/ok/ok/ 2 > +aretnap samba4 gcc ok/ 1/?/? > aretnap samba_3_0 gcc ok/ 1/?/? > aretnap ccache icc ok/ok/ok/ 1 > +aretnap samba4 icc ok/ 1/?/? > aretnap samba_3_0 icc ok/ 1/?/? > gc4 samba4 gcc ok/ 1/?/? > gc4 samba_3_0 gcc ok/ 1/?/? > @@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ > m30 rsync gcc ok/ok/ok/ 2 > m30 samba4 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > m30 samba_3_0 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > +metze02 samba gcc ok/ok/ok/ 1/PANIC > metze02 samba4 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > metze02 samba_3_0 gcc ok/ 2/?/? > opi ppp gcc ok/ 2/?/? -- / Alexander Bokovoy Samba Team http://www.samba.org/ ALT Linux Team http://www.altlinux.org/ Midgard Project Ry http://www.midgard-project.org/
pgpU4Ip170IEG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
