On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:22:18PM -0500, simo wrote: > > Yes, I'm following the streams of patches. Do you know what I thought > when I saw it? > "That would not have happened if we had a talloc hierarchy".
A talloc hierarchy hung off random pointers is a poor man's C++ (IMHO). It can be horribly misued. I'm wary of them at the moment. > But I see you feel strongly (reading another reply while answering) .. > in that case why not just make talloc_free check for context not being > null itself instead of adding a really ugly (visually because of all > caps) macro ? :-) Consistency with the Samba4 talloc. It's the Samba3 style here, I'd like to keep it consistent. Jeremy.
