-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher schrieb: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >>> Author: jra >>> Date: 2006-08-24 01:31:00 +0000 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006) >>> New Revision: 17766 >>> >>> WebSVN: >>> http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=17766 >>> >>> Log: >>> Getting ready to properly expose 100ns times on >>> the wire. Move the internals of nt_time functions >>> to use struct timespecs. >>> Jeremy. > > Hi Jeremy, > > wouldn't it make sense to use struct timeval, > as we use that in samba4 already. Is there any difference?
ah, ok it uses nanoseconds and timeval milliseconds. what's the function that gets the current time as a timespec struct? maybe it would also make sense to use timespec in samba3 and samba4. But we should try to use the same in both. metze -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE7V86m70gjA5TCD8RAn2xAKC5V1GYCP6YRxc0qG27mWrVedmn5gCgjJx4 Z7+uJnMqxnVe+D/C1Zzb4AY= =ZyBi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
