-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Author: vlendec
> Date: 2006-09-04 10:12:04 +0000 (Mon, 04 Sep 2006)
> New Revision: 18030
>
> WebSVN:
> http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=18030
>
> Log:
> When compiling with C++, nested structs lead to nested class definitions which
> are not compatible. I am aware that this would be a huge change in Samba4, but
> I would like to see it in the code that is shared.
Hi Volker,
Does this also apply to unnamed substructures?
like this:
struct foo {
int bla;
struct {
int val1;
int val1;
} vals;
};
and what's with unions with unnamed substructs?
like this:
union foo {
struct {
struct {
int val1;
} in;
struct {
int val2;
} out;
} level1;
};
metze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE+/30m70gjA5TCD8RAjXzAJ9m/wOTXDvDp726ScPn2fKNaP0Q/wCeNBNh
1iuMAbLtGaq9Y7AdNb2k9RE=
=V1I+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
