On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:23:57AM -0700, James Peach wrote: > > Why is having the ability to do this a good thing? If a client wants > to do unencrypted traffic it can always set up a new session.
Yes, but the thing that convinced me was the ability to have the following : [share_secure] encryption = mandatory path = /xxxx [share_unsecure] encryption = auto (or "no") path = /yyy If we want the server to be able to make encryption mandatory and we don't allow it per share then we disallow that server from serving any unencrypted (currently Windows) clients. People probably want the ability to serve both encrypted and non encrypted shares from the saem server. Currently the point is moot as the implmentation only supported encryption context zero - ie. encrypt everything. But the goal is not to contrain the design. Jeremy.