Hi Tim, On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:05:19AM -0700, Tim Prouty wrote: > I don't remember exactly what we agreed upon for the process of > backporting bug fixes to maintenance releases, but I think it was > something like, get the patch signed off by someone else, and then > Karolin will actually do the pushing. Does that sound right?
yes. Please open a bug report, attach the patch(es), add review flag(s) and re-assign the bug report to me when the patches are acked. > 3121249243f52dcbf8083f5ff137bd580515efa7 allowed us to correctly > handle renaming directories when a client has files open underneath > it, but it also introduced a bug. If a client holds open a handle to > the directory, and then tries to rename it, the rename should be > allowed, but in 3.4.x the client will get NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. We > have already seen a few instances of SMB clients doing this in the > field, and customers seeing this seemingly random > NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. > > The attached patches fix the problem against v3-4-test and add a > regression test so it's not broken by any future patches. The fix is > slightly different in 3.4 than it was for master due to the > smb_filename changes. > > Karolin, let me know if you would like me to push these myself, once I get > an ack. Thanks, Karolin -- Samba http://www.samba.org SerNet http://www.sernet.de sambaXP http://www.sambaxp.org
pgplRAWcKVeaK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
