The branch, master has been updated
       via  32915ce... Make Samba3 pass the RAW-LOCK test as Windows.
       via  1d3942c... Make smbtorture4 match Windows behavior.
      from  265e4df... s3: bug #6967: Prevent glibc error on net ads join: 
talloc()ed memory should not be SAFE_FREE()ed.

http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 32915ceefc718621e2e9b17fee97da82744ab67a
Author: Jeremy Allison <j...@samba.org>
Date:   Fri Dec 4 14:04:08 2009 -0800

    Make Samba3 pass the RAW-LOCK test as Windows.
    
    Implement the win7 NT_STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE.
    Make smbd behave as Windows does in canceling locks.
    
    Jeremy.

commit 1d3942c534791e7767b64be383e6e035b164c506
Author: Jeremy Allison <j...@samba.org>
Date:   Fri Dec 4 14:02:52 2009 -0800

    Make smbtorture4 match Windows behavior.
    
    Jeremy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 source3/locking/brlock.c   |    5 +++
 source3/smbd/reply.c       |   24 ++++++++++++
 source4/torture/raw/lock.c |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)


Changeset truncated at 500 lines:

diff --git a/source3/locking/brlock.c b/source3/locking/brlock.c
index b021293..22c6c9e 100644
--- a/source3/locking/brlock.c
+++ b/source3/locking/brlock.c
@@ -333,6 +333,11 @@ NTSTATUS brl_lock_windows_default(struct byte_range_lock 
*br_lck,
        SMB_ASSERT(plock->lock_type != UNLOCK_LOCK);
 
        for (i=0; i < br_lck->num_locks; i++) {
+               if (locks[i].start + locks[i].size < locks[i].start) {
+                       /* 64-bit wrap. Error. */
+                       return NT_STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE;
+               }
+
                /* Do any Windows or POSIX locks conflict ? */
                if (brl_conflict(&locks[i], plock)) {
                        /* Remember who blocked us. */
diff --git a/source3/smbd/reply.c b/source3/smbd/reply.c
index 030939f..185f601 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/reply.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/reply.c
@@ -7038,6 +7038,30 @@ NTSTATUS smbd_do_locking(struct smb_request *req,
                if (type & LOCKING_ANDX_CANCEL_LOCK) {
                        struct blocking_lock_record *blr = NULL;
 
+                       if (num_locks > 1) {
+                               /*
+                                * MS-CIFS (2.2.4.32.1) states that a cancel is 
honored if and only
+                                * if the lock vector contains one entry. When 
given mutliple cancel
+                                * requests in a single PDU we expect the 
server to return an
+                                * error. Windows servers seem to accept the 
request but only
+                                * cancel the first lock.
+                                * JRA - Do what Windows does (tm) :-).
+                                */
+
+#if 0
+                               /* MS-CIFS (2.2.4.32.1) behavior. */
+                               return NT_STATUS_DOS(ERRDOS,
+                                               ERRcancelviolation);
+#else
+                               /* Windows behavior. */
+                               if (i != 0) {
+                                       DEBUG(10,("smbd_do_locking: ignoring 
subsequent "
+                                               "cancel request\n"));
+                                       continue;
+                               }
+#endif
+                       }
+
                        if (lp_blocking_locks(SNUM(conn))) {
 
                                /* Schedule a message to ourselves to
diff --git a/source4/torture/raw/lock.c b/source4/torture/raw/lock.c
index f36d492..6871ed3 100644
--- a/source4/torture/raw/lock.c
+++ b/source4/torture/raw/lock.c
@@ -69,19 +69,20 @@
        }} while (0)
 #define BASEDIR "\\testlock"
 
-#define TARGET_SUPPORTS_SMBLOCK(_tctx) \
-    (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "smblock_pdu_support", true))
-#define TARGET_SUPPORTS_OPENX_DENY_DOS(_tctx) \
-    (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "openx_deny_dos_support", true))
-#define TARGET_SUPPORTS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE(_tctx) \
-    (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "invalid_lock_range_support", true))
 #define TARGET_IS_W2K8(_tctx) (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "w2k8", false))
 #define TARGET_IS_WIN7(_tctx) (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "win7", false))
 #define TARGET_IS_WINDOWS(_tctx) ((torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "w2k8", false)) 
|| \
-                                 (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "win7", false)))
+                                 (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "win7", false)) 
|| \
+                                 (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "w2k3", false)))
 #define TARGET_IS_SAMBA3(_tctx) (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "samba3", false))
 #define TARGET_IS_SAMBA4(_tctx) (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "samba4", false))
 
+#define TARGET_SUPPORTS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE(_tctx) \
+       (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "invalid_lock_range_support", true))
+#define TARGET_SUPPORTS_SMBLOCK(_tctx) \
+    (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "smblock_pdu_support", true))
+#define TARGET_SUPPORTS_OPENX_DENY_DOS(_tctx) \
+    (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "openx_deny_dos_support", true))
 /*
   test SMBlock and SMBunlock ops
 */
@@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ static bool test_async(struct torture_context *tctx,
         * requests in a single PDU we expect the server to return an
         * error. Samba4 handles this correctly. Windows servers seem to
         * accept the request but only cancel the first lock.  Samba3
-        * cancels both locks. */
+        * now does what Windows does (JRA).
+        */
        torture_comment(tctx, "testing multiple cancel\n");
 
        /* acquire second lock */
@@ -607,45 +609,35 @@ static bool test_async(struct torture_context *tctx,
        io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_CANCEL_LOCK | LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES;
        io.lockx.in.locks = lock;
        status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
-       if (TARGET_IS_WINDOWS(tctx) || TARGET_IS_SAMBA3(tctx)) {
-               CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
 
-               torture_warning(tctx, "Target server accepted a lock cancel "
-                                     "request with multiple locks. This 
violates "
-                                     "MS-CIFS 2.2.4.32.1.\n");
+       torture_warning(tctx, "Target server accepted a lock cancel "
+                             "request with multiple locks. This violates "
+                             "MS-CIFS 2.2.4.32.1.\n");
 
-               /* receive the failed lock requests */
-               status = smbcli_request_simple_recv(req);
-               CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
+       /* receive the failed lock requests */
+       status = smbcli_request_simple_recv(req);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
 
-               torture_assert(tctx,!(time(NULL) > t+2), talloc_asprintf(tctx,
-                              "first lock was not cancelled immediately 
(%s)\n",
-                              __location__));
+       torture_assert(tctx,!(time(NULL) > t+2), talloc_asprintf(tctx,
+                      "first lock was not cancelled immediately (%s)\n",
+                      __location__));
 
-               /* send cancel to second lock */
-               io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
-               io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
-               io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_CANCEL_LOCK |
-                                  LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES;
-               io.lockx.in.locks = &lock[1];
-               status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
-               if (TARGET_IS_SAMBA3(tctx)) {
-                       /* Samba3 supports multiple cancels in a single PDU. */
-                       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_DOS(ERRDOS,
-                                                          ERRcancelviolation));
-               } else {
-                       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
-               }
+       /* send cancel to second lock */
+       io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
+       io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
+       io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_CANCEL_LOCK |
+                          LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES;
+       io.lockx.in.locks = &lock[1];
+       status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
 
-               status = smbcli_request_simple_recv(req2);
-               CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
+       status = smbcli_request_simple_recv(req2);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
 
-               torture_assert(tctx,!(time(NULL) > t+2), talloc_asprintf(tctx,
-                              "second lock was not cancelled immediately 
(%s)\n",
-                              __location__));
-       } else {
-               CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_DOS(ERRDOS, ERRcancelviolation));
-       }
+       torture_assert(tctx,!(time(NULL) > t+2), talloc_asprintf(tctx,
+                      "second lock was not cancelled immediately (%s)\n",
+                      __location__));
 
        /* cleanup the second lock */
        io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;


-- 
Samba Shared Repository

Reply via email to