Hi Matthieu,
as you obviously didn't notice you can't find the differences at the
moment. This is because tridge reverted the modifications in
"provision_users.ldif" for now. This was due to a failing torture test
in "make test" which wasn't fixed.
So my apologies, you have to wait. I will recheckin the patches first,
in a more clear manner (since the last time the diff's were indeed very
hard to read - I forgot to control them and noticed this only later) and
second, when the torture suite also works against them.
Regarding the correction of the "upgradeprovision" script: I find this
very good. I introduced it since previously we had no real mechanism for
linked-attribute dependency resolving. Therefore I would really like to
let this in. Obviously, this doesn't fix the other issue with the wrong
"groupType"s (but I think we should work on this after the mentioned
"provision_users.ldif" changes - since now you can't notice them).
Greets,
Matthias
Matthieu Patou wrote:
Hello Mathias,
I'm not too pleased with this change as it tends to commit stuff
partially instead of one together once we are sure that everything was
(correctly) added at least with this way of doing we are sure that
once that the commit is done all the schema or all the partitions has
been updated and that the whole thing is relatively coherent.
Also apart from the groupType that we talk last sunday on irc, you
told me that some object where misplaced but when I do an
upgradeprovision against a alpha10 provision and I only found those 2
changes:
* CN=dns,CN=Users,DC=home,DC=matws,DC=net exist but with the wrong
objectSID
* CN=RID Set,CN=ARES,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=home,DC=matws,DC=net
Where are the other problem that you faced ?
Mattieu.
