Hi Jelmer!
I wrote this patch using instructions by abartlet. He might has overseen
this.
Greets,
Matthias
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 16:52 -0500, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
Summary of changes:
source4/selftest/tests.sh | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source4/selftest/tests.sh b/source4/selftest/tests.sh
index 1fd9d38..d4f7e47 100755
--- a/source4/selftest/tests.sh
+++ b/source4/selftest/tests.sh
@@ -126,7 +126,9 @@ if grep ENABLE_GNUTLS.1 $CONFIG_H> /dev/null; then
plantestsuite "ldb.ldaps with options $options" dc $bbdir/test_ldb.sh
ldaps \$SERVER_IP $options
done
fi
-plantestsuite "ldb.ldapi with options $options" dc $bbdir/test_ldb.sh ldapi
\$PREFIX_ABS/dc/private/ldapi $options
+for options in "" "-U\$USERNAME%\$PASSWORD"; do
+ plantestsuite "ldb.ldapi with options $options" dc $bbdir/test_ldb.sh
ldapi \$PREFIX_ABS/dc/private/ldapi $options
+done
I'm not too familiar with this code, but I'm wondering - does running
the ldapi test with -U make sense, don't we just use the socket
permissions?
Cheers,
Jelmer
