The branch, master has been updated
       via  1667ff7 s4-ldb_ldif: Take into account LDB_FLG_SHOW_BINARY
       via  fb0df53 s4-ldb_ldif: Don't check for LDB_FLG_SHOW_BINARY in 
ldb_should_b64_encode
      from  622ef6a s4-provision: Fixed owner/group for hard-coded Sites 
descriptor.

http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 1667ff79caa91d6bd97df127fb4a3b3d0fa5c3a1
Author: Kamen Mazdrashki <kame...@samba.org>
Date:   Tue Jan 18 00:51:30 2011 +0200

    s4-ldb_ldif: Take into account LDB_FLG_SHOW_BINARY
    
    when user requires binary data to be displayed
    using samba user-friendly ldif handlers
    
    Found using following test search:
    bin/ldbsearch -H st/dc/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Deleted 
Objects,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com" \
     "(objectGUID=97b52eac-6d89-434d-b935-1e5f2e086ffc)" replPropertyMetaData 
--show-deleted --show-binary
    
    Autobuild-User: Kamen Mazdrashki <kame...@samba.org>
    Autobuild-Date: Tue Jan 18 00:40:01 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104

commit fb0df534f46ccee8d541d5512abbcc9cd8247e53
Author: Kamen Mazdrashki <kame...@samba.org>
Date:   Tue Jan 18 00:49:17 2011 +0200

    s4-ldb_ldif: Don't check for LDB_FLG_SHOW_BINARY in ldb_should_b64_encode
    
    LDB_FLG_SHOW_BINARY is data representation flag and should
    not modify behavior of data checking functions.
    
    This lead to a bug in lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c as ltdb_index_key()
    function relies on ldb_should_b64_encode function to determine
    how to process index keys.
    
    Found using following test search:
    bin/ldbsearch -H st/dc/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Deleted 
Objects,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com" \
     "(objectGUID=97b52eac-6d89-434d-b935-1e5f2e086ffc)" replPropertyMetaData 
--show-deleted --show-binary

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c |    9 ++++-----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


Changeset truncated at 500 lines:

diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c 
b/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c
index 2628d4d..f837012 100644
--- a/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c
+++ b/source4/lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c
@@ -190,10 +190,6 @@ int ldb_should_b64_encode(struct ldb_context *ldb, const 
struct ldb_val *val)
        unsigned int i;
        uint8_t *p = val->data;
 
-       if (ldb->flags & LDB_FLG_SHOW_BINARY) {
-               return 0;
-       }
-
        if (val->length == 0) {
                return 0;
        }
@@ -333,11 +329,14 @@ int ldb_ldif_write(struct ldb_context *ldb,
 
                for (j=0;j<msg->elements[i].num_values;j++) {
                        struct ldb_val v;
+                       bool use_b64_encode;
                        ret = a->syntax->ldif_write_fn(ldb, mem_ctx, 
&msg->elements[i].values[j], &v);
                        if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
                                v = msg->elements[i].values[j];
                        }
-                       if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS || ldb_should_b64_encode(ldb, 
&v)) {
+                       use_b64_encode = !(ldb->flags & LDB_FLG_SHOW_BINARY)
+                                       && ldb_should_b64_encode(ldb, &v);
+                       if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS || use_b64_encode) {
                                ret = fprintf_fn(private_data, "%s:: ", 
                                                 msg->elements[i].name);
                                CHECK_RET;


-- 
Samba Shared Repository

Reply via email to