The branch, master has been updated
via c41895b CVE-2018-1050: s3: RPC: spoolss server. Protect against
null pointer derefs.
via 50e7788 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: changing dBCSPwd is only
allowed with a control
via c804568 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb: use
DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID
via ab7dc21 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/samdb: define
DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID control
via 407a34c CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: run password checking only once
via 3e6621f CVE-2018-1057: s4/dsdb: correctly detect password resets
via 9dd7dd9 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: add a NULL check for
talloc_new() in acl_check_password_rights()
via 766ab4c CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: add check for
DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_HASH_VALUES_OID control
via 0e15ce1 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: check for internal controls
before other checks
via 39e689a CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: remove unused else branches in
acl_check_password_rights()
via 2fea9ee CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: only call dsdb_acl_debug() if
we checked the acl in acl_check_password_rights()
via c653e51 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/password_hash: add a helper variable
for passwordAttr->num_values
via b23bf04 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/password_hash: add a helper variable
for LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE
via fbd1647 CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/tests: add a test for password
change with empty delete
from 614f5a0 README.Coding: codify line splitting on function calls
https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit c41895be8222199ffe69749e32afc9946517f63f
Author: Jeremy Allison <j...@samba.org>
Date: Tue Jan 2 15:56:03 2018 -0800
CVE-2018-1050: s3: RPC: spoolss server. Protect against null pointer derefs.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11343
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <j...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 13 16:06:10 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
commit 50e7788603b97104fe116a07ab14a1d1148f4405
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 23:11:38 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: changing dBCSPwd is only allowed with a control
This is not strictly needed to fig bug 13272, but it makes sense to also
fix this while fixing the overall ACL checking logic.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit c80456855197f9fe9ef497a7fc94504c28445343
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Fri Feb 16 15:38:19 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb: use DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID
This is used to pass information about which password change operation
(change
or reset) the acl module validated, down to the password_hash module.
It's very important that both modules treat the request identical.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit ab7dc210e9aedc1222055822ff296e4a67cfb27b
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Fri Feb 16 15:30:13 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/samdb: define
DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID control
Will be used to pass "user password change" vs "password reset" from the
ACL to the password_hash module, ensuring both modules treat the request
identical.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit 407a34c73fcd666c22776bbc4aa56d02c0683463
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Wed Feb 14 19:15:49 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: run password checking only once
This is needed, because a later commit will let the acl module add a
control to the change request msg and we must ensure that this is only
done once.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit 3e6621fe58014f19477633b1c0b54288550f0e87
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 22 10:54:37 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4/dsdb: correctly detect password resets
This change ensures we correctly treat the following LDIF
dn: cn=testuser,cn=users,...
changetype: modify
delete: userPassword
add: userPassword
userPassword: thatsAcomplPASS1
as a password reset. Because delete and add element counts are both
one, the ACL module wrongly treated this as a password change
request.
For a password change we need at least one value to delete and one value
to add. This patch ensures we correctly check attributes and their
values.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit 9dd7dd9ebba8d449feea66695fab3cbbb22d00e8
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Fri Feb 16 15:17:26 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: add a NULL check for talloc_new() in
acl_check_password_rights()
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit 766ab4c52b06532f2dd8801ccf5d4aadf07a098e
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 17:43:43 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: add check for
DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_HASH_VALUES_OID control
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit 0e15ce12e1e9733f1e8eb13e77cbcdd0aea29f29
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 22:59:24 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: check for internal controls before other checks
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit 39e689aa703536330083bfc4d58d15a2521e0f95
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 17:38:31 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: remove unused else branches in
acl_check_password_rights()
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit 2fea9ee701fed0417d8f681238663b7b00c451f8
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 17:38:31 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/acl: only call dsdb_acl_debug() if we checked the
acl in acl_check_password_rights()
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit c653e51a3d991e0e08327186881b324b85106f0d
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 14:40:59 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/password_hash: add a helper variable for
passwordAttr->num_values
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit b23bf04caeb196da9515addbcdf17db0723ee553
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 10:56:06 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/password_hash: add a helper variable for
LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
commit fbd16473ecf073f86e36f9e29a80151272661dce
Author: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Date: Thu Feb 15 12:43:09 2018 +0100
CVE-2018-1057: s4:dsdb/tests: add a test for password change with empty
delete
Note that the request using the clearTextPassword attribute for the
password change is already correctly rejected by the server.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
source3/rpc_server/spoolss/srv_spoolss_nt.c | 13 +++
source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c | 45 ++++++--
source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.h | 9 ++
source4/dsdb/tests/python/passwords.py | 49 +++++++++
source4/libcli/ldap/ldap_controls.c | 1 +
source4/setup/schema_samba4.ldif | 1 +
7 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/rpc_server/spoolss/srv_spoolss_nt.c
b/source3/rpc_server/spoolss/srv_spoolss_nt.c
index e546368..c9ea400 100644
--- a/source3/rpc_server/spoolss/srv_spoolss_nt.c
+++ b/source3/rpc_server/spoolss/srv_spoolss_nt.c
@@ -142,6 +142,11 @@ static void prune_printername_cache(void);
static const char *canon_servername(const char *servername)
{
const char *pservername = servername;
+
+ if (servername == NULL) {
+ return "";
+ }
+
while (*pservername == '\\') {
pservername++;
}
@@ -2041,6 +2046,10 @@ WERROR _spoolss_DeletePrinterDriver(struct pipes_struct
*p,
return WERR_ACCESS_DENIED;
}
+ if (r->in.architecture == NULL || r->in.driver == NULL) {
+ return WERR_INVALID_ENVIRONMENT;
+ }
+
/* check that we have a valid driver name first */
if ((version = get_version_id(r->in.architecture)) == -1) {
@@ -2180,6 +2189,10 @@ WERROR _spoolss_DeletePrinterDriverEx(struct
pipes_struct *p,
return WERR_ACCESS_DENIED;
}
+ if (r->in.architecture == NULL || r->in.driver == NULL) {
+ return WERR_INVALID_ENVIRONMENT;
+ }
+
/* check that we have a valid driver name first */
if (get_version_id(r->in.architecture) == -1) {
/* this is what NT returns */
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
index 27d4e76..d750362 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
@@ -966,11 +966,79 @@ static int acl_check_password_rights(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
{
int ret = LDB_SUCCESS;
unsigned int del_attr_cnt = 0, add_attr_cnt = 0, rep_attr_cnt = 0;
+ unsigned int del_val_cnt = 0, add_val_cnt = 0, rep_val_cnt = 0;
struct ldb_message_element *el;
struct ldb_message *msg;
+ struct ldb_control *c = NULL;
const char *passwordAttrs[] = { "userPassword", "clearTextPassword",
- "unicodePwd", "dBCSPwd", NULL }, **l;
+ "unicodePwd", NULL }, **l;
TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx);
+ struct dsdb_control_password_acl_validation *pav = NULL;
+
+ if (tmp_ctx == NULL) {
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ pav = talloc_zero(req, struct dsdb_control_password_acl_validation);
+ if (pav == NULL) {
+ talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ c = ldb_request_get_control(req, DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_CHANGE_OID);
+ if (c != NULL) {
+ pav->pwd_reset = false;
+
+ /*
+ * The "DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_CHANGE_OID" control means that we
+ * have a user password change and not a set as the message
+ * looks like. In it's value blob it contains the NT and/or LM
+ * hash of the old password specified by the user. This control
+ * is used by the SAMR and "kpasswd" password change mechanisms.
+ *
+ * This control can't be used by real LDAP clients,
+ * the only caller is samdb_set_password_internal(),
+ * so we don't have to strict verification of the input.
+ */
+ ret = acl_check_extended_right(tmp_ctx,
+ sd,
+ acl_user_token(module),
+ GUID_DRS_USER_CHANGE_PASSWORD,
+ SEC_ADS_CONTROL_ACCESS,
+ sid);
+ goto checked;
+ }
+
+ c = ldb_request_get_control(req, DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_HASH_VALUES_OID);
+ if (c != NULL) {
+ pav->pwd_reset = true;
+
+ /*
+ * The "DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_HASH_VALUES_OID" control, without
+ * "DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_CHANGE_OID" control means that we
+ * have a force password set.
+ * This control is used by the SAMR/NETLOGON/LSA password
+ * reset mechanisms.
+ *
+ * This control can't be used by real LDAP clients,
+ * the only caller is samdb_set_password_internal(),
+ * so we don't have to strict verification of the input.
+ */
+ ret = acl_check_extended_right(tmp_ctx, sd,
acl_user_token(module),
+ GUID_DRS_FORCE_CHANGE_PASSWORD,
+ SEC_ADS_CONTROL_ACCESS,
+ sid);
+ goto checked;
+ }
+
+ el = ldb_msg_find_element(req->op.mod.message, "dBCSPwd");
+ if (el != NULL) {
+ /*
+ * dBCSPwd is only allowed with a control.
+ */
+ talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
+ return LDB_ERR_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM;
+ }
msg = ldb_msg_copy_shallow(tmp_ctx, req->op.mod.message);
if (msg == NULL) {
@@ -984,12 +1052,15 @@ static int acl_check_password_rights(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
while ((el = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, *l)) != NULL) {
if (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(el->flags) ==
LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE) {
++del_attr_cnt;
+ del_val_cnt += el->num_values;
}
if (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(el->flags) == LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD) {
++add_attr_cnt;
+ add_val_cnt += el->num_values;
}
if (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(el->flags) ==
LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE) {
++rep_attr_cnt;
+ rep_val_cnt += el->num_values;
}
ldb_msg_remove_element(msg, el);
}
@@ -1002,26 +1073,30 @@ static int acl_check_password_rights(TALLOC_CTX
*mem_ctx,
return LDB_SUCCESS;
}
- if (ldb_request_get_control(req,
- DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_CHANGE_OID) != NULL) {
- /* The "DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_CHANGE_OID" control means that we
- * have a user password change and not a set as the message
- * looks like. In it's value blob it contains the NT and/or LM
- * hash of the old password specified by the user.
- * This control is used by the SAMR and "kpasswd" password
- * change mechanisms. */
+
+ if (rep_attr_cnt > 0) {
+ pav->pwd_reset = true;
+
ret = acl_check_extended_right(tmp_ctx, sd,
acl_user_token(module),
- GUID_DRS_USER_CHANGE_PASSWORD,
+ GUID_DRS_FORCE_CHANGE_PASSWORD,
SEC_ADS_CONTROL_ACCESS,
sid);
+ goto checked;
}
- else if (rep_attr_cnt > 0 || (add_attr_cnt != del_attr_cnt)) {
+
+ if (add_attr_cnt != del_attr_cnt) {
+ pav->pwd_reset = true;
+
ret = acl_check_extended_right(tmp_ctx, sd,
acl_user_token(module),
GUID_DRS_FORCE_CHANGE_PASSWORD,
SEC_ADS_CONTROL_ACCESS,
sid);
+ goto checked;
}
- else if (add_attr_cnt == 1 && del_attr_cnt == 1) {
+
+ if (add_val_cnt == 1 && del_val_cnt == 1) {
+ pav->pwd_reset = false;
+
ret = acl_check_extended_right(tmp_ctx, sd,
acl_user_token(module),
GUID_DRS_USER_CHANGE_PASSWORD,
SEC_ADS_CONTROL_ACCESS,
@@ -1030,17 +1105,53 @@ static int acl_check_password_rights(TALLOC_CTX
*mem_ctx,
if (ret == LDB_ERR_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS) {
ret = LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
}
+ goto checked;
+ }
+
+ if (add_val_cnt == 1 && del_val_cnt == 0) {
+ pav->pwd_reset = true;
+
+ ret = acl_check_extended_right(tmp_ctx, sd,
acl_user_token(module),
+ GUID_DRS_FORCE_CHANGE_PASSWORD,
+ SEC_ADS_CONTROL_ACCESS,
+ sid);
+ /* Very strange, but we get constraint violation in this case */
+ if (ret == LDB_ERR_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS) {
+ ret = LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
+ }
+ goto checked;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Everything else is handled by the password_hash module where it will
+ * fail, but with the correct error code when the module is again
+ * checking the attributes. As the change request will lack the
+ * DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID control, we can be sure that
+ * any modification attempt that went this way will be rejected.
+ */
+
+ talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
+ return LDB_SUCCESS;
+
+checked:
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
dsdb_acl_debug(sd, acl_user_token(module),
req->op.mod.message->dn,
true,
10);
+ talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
+ return ret;
}
- talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
- return ret;
-}
+ ret = ldb_request_add_control(req,
+ DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID, false, pav);
+ if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
+ ldb_debug(ldb_module_get_ctx(module), LDB_DEBUG_ERROR,
+ "Unable to register ACL validation control!\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ return LDB_SUCCESS;
+}
static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
{
@@ -1055,6 +1166,7 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct
ldb_request *req)
struct ldb_control *as_system;
struct ldb_control *is_undelete;
bool userPassword;
+ bool password_rights_checked = false;
TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx;
const struct ldb_message *msg = req->op.mod.message;
static const char *acl_attrs[] = {
@@ -1200,6 +1312,9 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct
ldb_request *req)
} else if (ldb_attr_cmp("unicodePwd", el->name) == 0 ||
(userPassword && ldb_attr_cmp("userPassword",
el->name) == 0) ||
ldb_attr_cmp("clearTextPassword", el->name) == 0) {
+ if (password_rights_checked) {
+ continue;
+ }
ret = acl_check_password_rights(tmp_ctx,
module,
req,
@@ -1210,6 +1325,7 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct
ldb_request *req)
if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
goto fail;
}
+ password_rights_checked = true;
} else if (ldb_attr_cmp("servicePrincipalName", el->name) == 0)
{
ret = acl_check_spn(tmp_ctx,
module,
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
index 2e6464f..1c1de09 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
@@ -3512,7 +3512,35 @@ static int setup_io(struct ph_context *ac,
/* On "add" we have only "password reset" */
ac->pwd_reset = true;
} else if (ac->req->operation == LDB_MODIFY) {
- if (io->og.cleartext_utf8 || io->og.cleartext_utf16
+ struct ldb_control *pav_ctrl = NULL;
+ struct dsdb_control_password_acl_validation *pav = NULL;
+
+ pav_ctrl = ldb_request_get_control(ac->req,
+ DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID);
+ if (pav_ctrl != NULL) {
+ pav = talloc_get_type_abort(pav_ctrl->data,
+ struct dsdb_control_password_acl_validation);
+ }
+
+ if (pav == NULL && ac->update_password) {
+ bool ok;
+
+ /*
+ * If the DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID
+ * control is missing, we require system access!
+ */
+ ok = dsdb_module_am_system(ac->module);
+ if (!ok) {
+ return ldb_module_operr(ac->module);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (pav != NULL) {
+ /*
+ * We assume what the acl module has validated.
+ */
+ ac->pwd_reset = pav->pwd_reset;
+ } else if (io->og.cleartext_utf8 || io->og.cleartext_utf16
|| io->og.nt_hash || io->og.lm_hash) {
/* If we have an old password specified then for sure it
* is a user "password change" */
@@ -4246,25 +4274,26 @@ static int password_hash_modify(struct ldb_module
*module, struct ldb_request *r
}
while ((passwordAttr = ldb_msg_find_element(msg, *l)) != NULL) {
- if (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(passwordAttr->flags) ==
LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE) {
+ unsigned int mtype =
LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(passwordAttr->flags);
+ unsigned int nvalues = passwordAttr->num_values;
+
+ if (mtype == LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE) {
++del_attr_cnt;
}
- if (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(passwordAttr->flags) ==
LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD) {
+ if (mtype == LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD) {
++add_attr_cnt;
}
- if (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(passwordAttr->flags) ==
LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE) {
+ if (mtype == LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE) {
++rep_attr_cnt;
}
- if ((passwordAttr->num_values != 1) &&
- (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(passwordAttr->flags) ==
LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD)) {
+ if ((nvalues != 1) && (mtype == LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD)) {
talloc_free(ac);
ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb,
"'%s' attribute must
have exactly one value on add operations!",
*l);
return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
}
- if ((passwordAttr->num_values > 1) &&
- (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(passwordAttr->flags) ==
LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE)) {
+ if ((nvalues > 1) && (mtype == LDB_FLAG_MOD_DELETE)) {
talloc_free(ac);
ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb,
"'%s' attribute must
have zero or one value(s) on delete operations!",
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.h b/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.h
index 6a4820c..eb52740 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.h
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.h
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ struct dsdb_control_password_user_account_control {
#define DSDB_CONTROL_INVALID_NOT_IMPLEMENTED "1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.3.32"
+/*
+ * Used to pass "user password change" vs "password reset" from the ACL to the
+ * password_hash module, ensuring both modules treat the request identical.
+ */
+#define DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.3.33"
+struct dsdb_control_password_acl_validation {
+ bool pwd_reset;
+};
+
#define DSDB_EXTENDED_REPLICATED_OBJECTS_OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.4.1"
struct dsdb_extended_replicated_object {
struct ldb_message *msg;
diff --git a/source4/dsdb/tests/python/passwords.py
b/source4/dsdb/tests/python/passwords.py
index 357b340..40b63b5 100755
--- a/source4/dsdb/tests/python/passwords.py
+++ b/source4/dsdb/tests/python/passwords.py
@@ -1068,6 +1068,55 @@ userPassword: thatsAcomplPASS4
# Reset the "minPwdLength" as it was before
self.ldb.set_minPwdLength(minPwdLength)
+ def test_pw_change_delete_no_value_userPassword(self):
+ """Test password change with userPassword where the delete attribute
doesn't have a value"""
+
+ try:
+ self.ldb2.modify_ldif("""
+dn: cn=testuser,cn=users,""" + self.base_dn + """
+changetype: modify
+delete: userPassword
+add: userPassword
+userPassword: thatsAcomplPASS1
+""")
+ except LdbError, (num, msg):
+ self.assertEquals(num, ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION)
+ else:
+ self.fail()
+
+ def test_pw_change_delete_no_value_clearTextPassword(self):
+ """Test password change with clearTextPassword where the delete
attribute doesn't have a value"""
+
+ try:
+ self.ldb2.modify_ldif("""
+dn: cn=testuser,cn=users,""" + self.base_dn + """
+changetype: modify
+delete: clearTextPassword
+add: clearTextPassword
+clearTextPassword: thatsAcomplPASS2
+""")
+ except LdbError, (num, msg):
+ self.assertTrue(num == ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION or
+ num == ERR_NO_SUCH_ATTRIBUTE) # for Windows
+ else:
+ self.fail()
+
+ def test_pw_change_delete_no_value_unicodePwd(self):
+ """Test password change with unicodePwd where the delete attribute
doesn't have a value"""
+
+ try:
+ self.ldb2.modify_ldif("""
+dn: cn=testuser,cn=users,""" + self.base_dn + """
+changetype: modify
+delete: unicodePwd
+add: unicodePwd
+unicodePwd:: """ +
base64.b64encode("\"thatsAcomplPASS3\"".encode('utf-16-le')) + """
+""")
+ except LdbError, (num, msg):
+ self.assertEquals(num, ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION)
+ else:
+ self.fail()
+
def tearDown(self):
super(PasswordTests, self).tearDown()
delete_force(self.ldb, "cn=testuser,cn=users," + self.base_dn)
diff --git a/source4/libcli/ldap/ldap_controls.c
b/source4/libcli/ldap/ldap_controls.c
index 9df95c3..7ecc908 100644
--- a/source4/libcli/ldap/ldap_controls.c
+++ b/source4/libcli/ldap/ldap_controls.c
@@ -1262,6 +1262,7 @@ static const struct ldap_control_handler
ldap_known_controls[] = {
{ DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_CHANGE_STATUS_OID, NULL, NULL },
{ DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_HASH_VALUES_OID, NULL, NULL },
{ DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_CHANGE_OID, NULL, NULL },
+ { DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID, NULL, NULL },
{ DSDB_CONTROL_APPLY_LINKS, NULL, NULL },
{ LDB_CONTROL_BYPASS_OPERATIONAL_OID, NULL, NULL },
{ DSDB_CONTROL_CHANGEREPLMETADATA_OID, NULL, NULL },
diff --git a/source4/setup/schema_samba4.ldif b/source4/setup/schema_samba4.ldif
index ebc1ae6..6aafc9e 100644
--- a/source4/setup/schema_samba4.ldif
+++ b/source4/setup/schema_samba4.ldif
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@
#Allocated: LDB_CONTROL_RECALCULATE_RDN_OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.3.30
#Allocated: DSDB_CONTROL_FORCE_RODC_LOCAL_CHANGE 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.3.31
#Allocated: DSDB_CONTROL_INVALID_NOT_IMPLEMENTED 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.3.32
+#Allocated: DSDB_CONTROL_PASSWORD_ACL_VALIDATION_OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.3.33
# Extended 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.4.x
--
Samba Shared Repository
