On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:35:38AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:55:20PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:48:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > And are you saying that Win2k will never 'idle' a client connection? I'm > > > sure I've seen smbfs being 'idled' by NT before... > > > > I don't think it ever drops the TCP connection on purpose. > > I'm quite positive it does. I have seen sites with 'security = server' fail > miserably after having changed to W2k on the DC due to disconnects from the DC.
No, I mean that the Win2k server service won't drop a client connection on purpose if there's no traffic on it (it doesn't idle connections). Jeremy.