"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote: > > > > Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2? > > > > I don't work in any other area at the moment. > > That's not a real good reason IMO. The libsmbclient > code should be sync'd between HEAD and SAMBA_2_2 > so you should be able to work in either branch. > We really need to leave SAMBA_2_2 alone....
Just watch in that sync-up - tridge fixed up some (quite serious) bugs in the HEAD version (wins *registrations* in the client) and we don't want them 'merged back'. > > > It looks > > > like it could potentially de-stablize the libsmbclient library > > > and I would prefer not to do on 2.2. > > > > If we get it right, it should be compatible. > > That's a bug **if** though. What effect will this have on > someone running a client written to use libsmbclient.so > delivered with 2.2.x after they upgrade? This worries me - if we do a security release we really don't want to break stuff in the process. > > It would be nice if the two were in step, though, as far as libsmbclient > > is concerned. > > See comments above. I have to agree. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net