On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote: > > In addition, no matter what Unicode representation is used, you > still have to deal with different representations of the "same" > character (is it a single character "a" with an umlat, or "a" > plus a combining umlat character?, etc.)
Only Apple does this to my knowledge. Microsoft does not use compose characters in their UCS2 on the wire. I'm voting with MS on this one :-). But Simo, I disagree about the internal rep. I think it needs to be utf8 for Samba internal strings. We already have to deal with mbcs issues - this doesn't make it any worse. Jeremy.
