On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Andrew Theurer wrote: > > > 3. The report claims 163.471 MBytes of data Transferred, yet a full > > capture is larger than 334 MBytes (that capture dropped a few frames). > > Generally my Netbench reported peak throughput is about 10-15% lower than > what I see in my sar report. The only thing that comes to mind is that the > numbers NetBench reports are based on file data, and not all network data > (header, etc), but I can't see how this would be 2x difference. I would > generally expect whatever Netbench reports, the capture would be smaller due > to client caching.
I hope to find out today by asking Samba's profiling stuff how many reads and writes were seen and how many bytes were read and written. Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
