On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:15:26PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> I'll just mention that the caching code in the ubiqx subdirectory is fully
> capable of handling all of this stuff.

Yes, I've seen ubi_cache. Though despite that it has very nice features
and looks good, it is more difficult when it comes to implementing
its tdb backend. This kind of cache is most effective if it resides in
memory (as you've written in comments).


-- 
cheers,
+------------------------------------------------------------+
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   |
|*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba                                  /
|__________________________________________________________/

Reply via email to