On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:34:47PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter': > There is no intention to create a similar backend for the sam. Instead, > we do intend to solve this problem in exactly the way you indicate > below. There is no intention to provide a 'mulidb' module either. The > only way to load more than one module will be to have separate domains. Why? I think having a multidb module would be the perfect solution for when one has multiple backends - it doesn't clutter the interface and provides those people who need it support for multiple backends.
Jelmer