On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 03:13, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Jean Francois Micouleau wrote: > > > It's getting clear that you are reinventing something we already have. > > All your SAM api is simply the SAMR server pipe code. Why do you want to > > implement a new api as we already have one ? > > I have a history of doing this - and I intend to continue...
I think jfm was criticizing the fact that you are building the interface too much close to samr one, and that we do not have the need to do so. I really do not think the jfm was proposing to use the samr interface for internal use. I agree to this vision, following too much the samr interface make us only more unfriendly to the rest of samba code, that need much greater flexibility as you recognized. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
