On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 15:40, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Yep, that sounds worthwhile. We could even just make it a timeout - and > finally put gencache to use :-). (mimir's generalised tdb cache).
We do **not** need timeouts! remember that sid->uid mapping is written in stone, once you have done it it cannot be changed _ever_. > > But to use ldap as a central storage you have to solve how to handle > > foreign or builtin/special SIDs! > > Well, I was only looking at mapping our own domain - I was thinking the > rest should happend via winbind. However, it does make more sense that > this is all handled in one place. I think we can deal with this. if you want it to be fast, better it stay in one place. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part