On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:39:58AM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > And thanks for the quick fix. There's still a problem in the nisplus > > backend, I believe; a chunk of private_data is allocated but never > > freed. Fortunately, this is a mere memory leak, and not a segfault. :)
> It's in, thanks! > If you do have a nisplus server there, could you re-check whether > nisplussam works 100% correctly? I converted it to the new passdb > interface at CIFS this summer, but I haven't been able to test it > since I don't have a nisplus server around. Afraid I don't... was just looking over the code, and noticed that nisplus would have the same problem that unixsam would. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
msg03935/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
