On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:02:11PM -0800, Chris de Vidal wrote: > Still, wouldn't you welcome documentation advising > people of potential corruption? I think we both agree > that there is no guarantee that everyone's network is > 100% "on" and the danger of corruption appears to be > greater when there are large files read and written to > a record at a time (namely, flat databases).
Well we ship by default with the same options as Windows. Windows will ignore oplock missing oplock break responses. At least we log a message. Jeremy.
